



b. 125
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||
b. 125
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
The missing slur under the last semiquaver triplet seems to be an inaccuracy of notation, although one cannot exclude that in the face of the progressing smorzando, Chopin did not feel the need to clarify the legato articulation of these notes. The reviser of GE3 considered the missing slur to be an inaccuracy. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||
b. 125-126
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
An additional tie of e is almost certainly an arbitrary revision of EE. Chopin proofread FE, adding similar ties in the two previous bars; in spite of a minor inaccuracy in the implementation of that proofreading, there is no reason to assume that he then overlooked a tie in that place. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||
b. 125
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
At the beginning of the bar, there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of A , FE revisions |
||||||
b. 125
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
The fact that the slur of FE does not reach the c1-a category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |