Issues : Errors of A

b. 56-59

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

In Atut, Chopin wrote these bars almost as if there were 3 sharps in the key signature (the A major key) – he overlooked the majority of the sharps raising c(1,2) to c(1,2), both sharps raising g1 to gand the  raising d1 to din bar 57. All overlooked marks were added in FE (→GE,EE).

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of A , FE revisions

b. 68-72

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

In Atut (→FE), the minims in bars 68 and 72 are devoid of extending dots, which, in both cases, must be considered a mistake. Dots were added in GE and EE.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Rhythmic errors , Errors of A

b. 79-83

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

In bar 79 in Atut, Chopin wrote a  only before the top note of the octave at the beginning of the bar, which was corrected already in FE (→GE,EE). In an analogous situation four bars later, there are no accidentals before the 1st octave in Atut, which was repeated in FE and corrected only just in GE and EE

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of A , FE revisions , Inaccuracies in A , Errors repeated in FE

b. 125

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

At the beginning of the bar, there is no  raising g1 to gin Atut. While writing the fourth consecutive g1, Chopin did not notice that the mark should be repeated in the new bar. The sharp was added already in FE (→GE,EE).

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of A , FE revisions

b. 133

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

The g-eminim is devoid of extending dots in Atut. This patent mistake – eis, after all, extended to the next bar – was corrected already in FE (→GE,EE).

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Rhythmic errors , Errors of A , FE revisions