|
b. 160
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
We consider the source version, with the slur that does not go beyond bar 159, to be an inaccuracy – see the note on the previous page. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||||
|
b. 160-172
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In GE3, the repeated chords in bars 160, 162 and 171-172 were written in an abbreviated manner as minims with quaver tremolos. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||||
|
b. 160
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||
|
b. 160-162
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The missing slurs over three subsequent figures in bars 161-162 (in both hands) must be a result of graphic difficulties at the time of writing slurs between the parts of both hands, written on one stave. In EE and GE3, in which each hand was placed on a separate stave, the slurs were added. According to us, the three-bar slur entered in FEH emphasises the difference in articulation and in general character between bars 156-159 and 160-162 and the following ones. In the main text, we do not include that slur, having the nature of a teaching comment. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Annotations in FEH |
|||||||
|
b. 160-161
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
The absence of accents – cf. analogous bars 152-153 – certainly does not mean that the figurations in these bars are supposed to be less brilliant, while the shape of the motifs – less vivid. Therefore, according to us, it is an inaccuracy of notation, which we remove in the main text. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
