Issues : Inaccuracies in GE
|
b. 589-590
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In accordance with the analysis of the Chopinesque category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 600-603
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
Those obvious inaccuracies in the three editons obscure deciphering Chopin's intentions regarding slurring of the part. In the main text we present the slurs notated without clear faults in GC. They represent possible articulationn of the chords progression. While interpreting the slur in # EE we assume that the error applies to b. 600 (half of the line spanning bars 598-600 has no slurs in EE). We retain the slurs in GE as despite the inaccurate copy of the basis (GC) they are formally correct. The FE slurs may be interpreted in a variety of ways, among others as distorted GC slurs or as the aforementioned. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 620
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The additional dot in GE seems to be a routine addition of the engraver, convinced of the mark having been overlooked in FE. On the other hand, such an oversight cannot be excluded. In the main text, we stick to the version of the principal source – FE, which is also supported by the fact that the articulation of the final demisemiquaver results from the rhythmic context and does not require specification. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 631-632
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In both manuscripts the slur clearly reaches b. 632, although due to the absence of text in this bar – b. 632 opens a section written in an abbreviated manner as repetition of b. 181-244 – it may be considered an inaccuracy. It was regarded as such both in FE and GE. In turn, EE contain the correct slur, probably under the influence of b. 180-181. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 641-644
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The visibly incomplete slurring of GE1 (→GE2) probably reflects one of the original versions of the slurs in FE, changed then in the last phase of proofreading. The slur added in GE3 constitutes a natural addition, in particular in the face of the authentic slurring of six previous bars. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
in 
marks in this and analogous pairs of bars (see 
