mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 132

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

No sign in A (→GE→FE→EE)

Arpeggio sign written into FED

Our variant suggestion
..

Arpeggio before the chord with the grace note was added in FED by Chopin. Similarly in bar 280.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED

b. 132

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

Slur break after e1 in A & GE2

Slur break before e1 in GE1

Contiguous slurs in FE (→EE)
..

Even in such a seemingly obvious situation, the engraver of GE1 separated the slurs in the middle of the bar, contrary to A and the musical sense. The extension of the first slur in FE (→EE), although it returns the range of the slur written in A, is probably another inaccuracy.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions

b. 132

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Long accent in FE (→EE)

Short accent in GE
..

The accent, clearly long in FE, was shortened in GE to a typical, short mark. It is a typical inaccuracy, resulting from a routine approach to the issue of accents.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 132

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

 on 2nd quaver in FE (→EE)

 at beginning of bar in GE
..

A comparison with the dynamic markings in analogous bars 136 and 140 points to an inaccurate placement of the ​​​​​​​ mark in FE (→EE). In the main text, we take into account the shift of the mark adopted in GE. 

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Centrally placed marks

b. 132

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

Wedge in FE (→EE,GE1→GE2)

No mark in GE3
..

The missing wedge in GE3 may be an oversight; however, it cannot be excluded that the mark was removed on purpose, taking into account the absence of similar marks in analogous bars in GE1 (→GE2).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE