b. 132-136
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In FE, there is no before the 9th semiquaver in bars 132 and 136. The patent inaccuracy was corrected both in GE and EE. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||||
b. 132
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
In GE1 the minim is printed at the pitch of e1, however, the ledger line below the note is missing, as a result of which it looks like c1. Consequently, GE2 (→GE3) features here c1, which is a mistake. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||||||
b. 132
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
FE (→GE) are lacking in the restoring f2 on the 11th small note and in the restoring b1 on the last one. EE corrected only the latter; in turn, two cautionary accidentals were added – before e2 (5th quaver) and before g2 (10th quaver). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions |
||||||||||
b. 132
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
A long accent could have been added in the penultimate stage of proofreading of FE; it is indicated by the absence of the mark in EE along with the shift of dim. – see the previous note. In GE the mark was almost certainly erroneously interpreted as a hairpin. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||||
b. 132
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
Due to graphic retouches of this fragment of the page, GE1a overlooked , which was also repeated in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources |