mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 107

composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor

in A & EE2

No marking in FE (→GE,EE1)
..

The omission of  in FE (→GE,EE1) can be intentional.
EE2 presumably copied the marking from bar 51 and 155.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Authentic corrections of FE

b. 107

composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor

Slur in A, EE & GE2 )→GE3→GE4)

No slur in FE (→GE1)
..

FE (→GE1) omitted the slur in the L.H. It is undoubtedly an engraver's inaccuracy. Cf. the neighbouring note.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions

b. 107

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

Fingering written into FED

No teaching fingering
..

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED

b. 107

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

No slur in A (→GE)

Slur in FE (→EE), literal reading

Slur in FE (→EE), interpretation suggested by the editors

Our alternative suggestion
..

Same as in analogous bar 105, the slur added by Chopin in the proofreading of FE (→EE) may be interpreted twofold. We also suggest an alternative notation, modelled after the notation of EE in bar 105.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions; Corrections & alterations

issues: Authentic corrections of FE

b. 107

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

..

In A (→GE1→FE) the dot extending the value of the crotchet was inadvertently written next to f1. The mistake was corrected in EE and GE2. The traces of erasures visible in A suggest that Chopin first inadvertently wrote dots next to both notes and then he mistook them again, deleting the one that should have stayed.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors resulting from corrections , GE revisions , Rhythmic errors , Errors of A