b. 131
|
composition: Op. 19, Bolero
..
In EE1 (→EE2), the engraver overlooked the a notes in the chords on the 3rd and 4th semiquavers in the bar. The mistake was rectified in EE3. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE |
|||||
b. 131
|
composition: Op. 19, Bolero
..
The version of EE is almost certainly arbitrary – nothing indicates a possibility of a Chopinesque proofreading of the edition; there is also no reason to assume an oversight of by Chopin. Similarly, in bar 243. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||
b. 131
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
The engraver of GE overlooked the staccato dot for the 1st quaver in the L.H. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
|||||
b. 131-132
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
Just like in all similar situations, in the main text we give the notation of A (→FC), which is present also in GE2. The changes were introduced in the remaining editions: replacing both bars with one double bar in FE (→EE) and providing rests with digits cannot come from Chopin. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , FE revisions |
|||||
b. 131-132
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
The fact that dim. appears earlier is probably the initial version of this fragment's dynamics, changed by Chopin in the penultimate stage of proofreading of FE (→GE). In addition to moving this indication, Chopin probably added a long accent at the beginning of b. 132, emphasising the moment from which the diminuendo should begin. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |