



b. 104
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||||
b. 104
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In GE1 the second out of three accents was overlooked and the difference in their length was not taken into account. The overlooked accent was restored in the proofreading of FE (most probably by Chopin) and in GE2. The change of font of the accents in EE is a typical revision of this edition. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||||
b. 104-105
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
The return to tempo is marked in FE (→EE) only in the solo part, in bar 105. Tempo 1o introduced a bar earlier in GE is most probably an editorial revision – cf. a similar situation in bar 52. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 104
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
We consider the omitted accent under the beginning of the characteristic motif, imitated in the parts of French horns, bassoons and clarinets, to be Chopin's inadvertence. The mark is present in analogous bar 116, whereas in the part of bassoons, both bars are marked in the same way. The accent was added in EE, probably on the basis of comparison with bar 116. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 104
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
The sources contain a cautionary category imprint: Editorial revisions; Source & stylistic information issues: Cautionary accidentals |