



b. 104-105
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The double bar line is most probably a routine addition of the copyist. Its absence in GE is most probably a mistake. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in GC |
||||||
b. 104-108
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
In this phrase, the slur in GC (→GE) begins on the 2nd beat of bar 104, which, in spite of concordance with EE, we consider to be an inaccuracy, as in other similar situations, the slurs in GC generally start from the beginning of the bar. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions |
||||||
b. 104
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
Same as in bars 40 and 56, Chopin hesitated whether the last quaver in bars 104 and 120 is to be a f category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions; Corrections & alterations |
||||||
b. 104
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
The fermata under the part of the L.H. could have been added in the proofreading of FE1 by Chopin. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
b. 104-120
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor category imprint: Differences between sources |