



b. 101
|
composition: Op. 12, Variations in B♭ major
..
The lack of a L.H. slur in FE (→GE) is probably an oversight, so we add it in the main text, as was done in EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||||||
b. 102
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
The sources differ slightly in the range of the crescendo hairpins whose beginning is placed under the 3rd (A), 2nd (FE) or 4th (FE) quaver. We adopt the notation of A (→GE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins |
||||||||||
b. 102
|
composition: Op. 43, Tarantella
..
In A the initial b in LH in b. 86 (and corresponding bars 102 and 134, where in the manuscripts repetition of this phrase is not written out with notes) is notated slightly too low and becomes A category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccurate note pitch in A |
||||||||||
b. 102-104
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
In bars 102-103, the sources have two different versions of the R.H. part. In A (→GE) the text almost entirely follows the version found in analogous bars 18-19 and 50-51, the only difference being the presence of the staccato sign on the 2nd beat of bar 103 – a wedge in A, a dot in GE. When correcting FE (→EE), Chopin varied the last repetition of that phrase filling both bars with uniform quaver movement. Cf. bar 98. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE , Main-line changes |
||||||||||
b. 102
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor
..
The absence of an accent in A (→GE1→FE→EE) seems to be the result of Chopin's oversight; this finds confirmation in the fact that accents are present in the corresponding bars of the other repetitions of that phrase, as well as in analogous bars 100 and 104. A short accent was added in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |