b. 122
|
composition: Op. 25 No 5, Etude in E minor
..
The absence of the sign in FE could mean that Chopin considered a possibility of a longer sustention of pedal, even to the end of bar 123. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||||||||
b. 122-123
|
composition: Op. 25 No 5, Etude in E minor
..
Looking at 5 accents over the chords of the L.H. in FC, it is not easy to determine which hand they concern. The accents are written with the copyist's hand, hence one can assume that it looked similar in the remaining Stichvorlage manuscripts. As a result, in FE and EE the accents were assigned to the R.H., whereas in GE1 (→GE2) – to the left one. According to us, the signs concern both the right and left hands, which, in a non-authentic, yet equal manner, was marked in GE3. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||||||||
b. 122
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
In GC there is no before the 2nd quaver in the L.H. This patent inaccuracy was completed in GE. The remaining sources include the correct text. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Inaccuracies in GC |
||||||||||||||
b. 122
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||||||||
b. 122
|
composition: Op. 19, Bolero
..
We suggest adding for the 1st quaver in the L.H. The marking was placed by Chopin in the reprise in bar 234. category imprint: Editorial revisions |