



b. 101
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 4, Mazurka in C# minor
..
In the main text we give the FC (→GE) version, entered by Chopin instead of the crossed-out chord, preserved in FE (→EE). Chopin's correction also included the addition of category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FC |
||||||||
b. 101
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 4, Mazurka in C# minor
..
category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Errors in GE |
||||||||
b. 101-103
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 4, Mazurka in C# minor
..
Instead of the short accent in bar 101, which is present in FC (in Fontana's hand) and FE (→EE), Chopin entered into FC two long accents in bars 101 and 103 (deleting the Fontana accent in bar 101). We include this change in the main text. We consider both accents in GE to be short, although the one in bar 101 is slightly longer than the remaining ones on this page. This difference certainly was not regarded as significant by the persons reading the Mazurka text. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Long accents |
||||||||
b. 101-104
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 4, Mazurka in C# minor category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FC |
||||||||
b. 101
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
The fact that in FE (→EE) the crescendo begins slightly later could be of an accidental nature or could mean that Chopin added the indication twice – once in A and once in [FC] or while proofreading FE1. category imprint: Differences between sources |