|
b. 123-124
|
composition: Op. 25 No 5, Etude in E minor
..
Interpretation of the slurs of the L.H. in FC poses a significant challenge due to the category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in FC |
|||||||||||
|
b. 123-127
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
The ending of the slur is written in the sources inaccurately (in FE there are no slurs starting from bar 121). In the main text we suggest a slur based on the most accurately written slurs of analogous phrases (e.g. FE in bars 85-90 and 93-98). category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , EE inaccuracies , Inaccuracies in GC , Authentic corrections of EE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 123
|
composition: Op. 64 No 1, Waltz in D♭ major
..
The sign added in FED, indicating the manner of synchronising the grupetto in the R.H. with the accompaniment in the L.H., means that the first 18 notes of the grupetto are to be understood as quaver triplets, whereas the last six – as normal quavers, as in bars 35 and 107. It is unknown whether it was the only performance option accepted by Chopin. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED , Synchronization markings |
|||||||||||
|
b. 123
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
Starting a slur from the beginning of a bar is a characteristic inaccuracy of GE1 (→FE→EE), corrected in GE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
|
b. 123
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources |
sign written over the slurs. According to us, it is more likely that the slurs are supposed to create one sign. The slurs of 
