



Verbal indications
b. 402-403
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
Omission of the dashes marking the range of crescendo in GE seems to be a routine revision, since in that particular case the crescendo's range does not raise substantial doubts, and omitting dashes is a frequent phenomenon in this source. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||||
b. 408
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
GE contains an erroneous "leggiere" instead of "leggiero," whereas the indication in EE is also erroneous – "leggio." category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE , Errors in GE |
||||||||||
b. 408
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
The lack of category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||||||
b. 416-419
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
The dashes marking the range of crescendo were omitted in GE, as in many other places in the Rondo. In EE, the indication – within the marked range – was divided into syllables what is a revision, typical of the English publisher. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||||
b. 420-423
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
Omitting dashes marking the range of a dynamic (or agogic) change is a frequent inaccuracy in first editions of Chopin's works, particularly when transitioning to a new line, as in FE (→GE,EE) here. In the main text, we suggest conducing dashes to the peak of the raising sequence, i.e.to the end of bar 423. category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE |