Verbal indications
|
b. 148-149
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
According to us, the range of stretto was inaccurately conveyed by the engraver of FE (→EE) – it should last until ritenuto. An oversight of dashes is even more likely, since bar 149 opens a new line of text. Therefore, in the main text we suggest adding dashes accordingly. In GE, there are no dashes at all, which is a frequent inaccuracy of that edition. However, in this case, if our interpretation of Chopin's intention is correct, leaving stretto alone seems to be less misleading than marking its range inaccurately. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies |
||||||||
|
b. 168-172
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In the main text, we adopt the notation of crescendo of FE (→EE). In GE, the division into syllables and the dashes marking the range of the dynamic change were overlooked. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 184-186
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In GE, there are no dashes marking the range of crescendo, like in most of similar situations. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 214-215
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In GE, there are no dashes marking the range of diminuendo. It is most probably an arbitrary revision of the editor, since there are no dashes in the entire source. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 228
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
GE includes an erroneous "leggiere" instead of "leggiero." category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
