Verbal indications
|
b. 52
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
The indications added in EE2 (→EE3) are totally arbitrary in this place. The reviser could have assumed that the beginning of the actual Rondo should be provided with a specific dynamic marking, particularly since such indications appear only just in bar 90 (dolce e leggiero) and 100 ( category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||||
|
b. 66-67
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
The contrasting dynamic indications are a completely arbitrary addition of the revision of EE2 (→EE3). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||||
|
b. 90
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
FE feature an erroneous 'leggiere' instead of 'leggiero.' There is a similar situation in bar 242. It is probably because of this reason that the reviser of GE incorrectly unified those indications in the entire Rondo as 'leggiere.' EE rightly corrected the last letter. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
|||||||
|
b. 105-107
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
Omitting dashes marking the range of a dynamic change is a frequent inaccuracy of GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||
|
b. 108-109
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In EE, ritenuto was not divided into syllables. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
dolce in 
). While adding them, he used authentic indications, present in bars 39 and 143. There is a similar situation in bar 360.
