|
b. 67-72
|
composition: Op. 22, Andante spianato
..
The accents in b. 67 and 70 are slightly longer in FE than those in b. 68-69 and 71-72. According to us, it may mean that a similar difference was present in [A]. As a result, in the main text we reproduce them as long and short accents, respectively. In GE1 there are no noticeable differences in length between the accents – all marks are of the same size as the majority of the accents in the previous section – hence we give them the form of long accents, just like there. Taking into account the fact that except for the last mark in b. 78 and 90 all accents in this section concern either longer rhythmic values (at least minims) or short motifs, within which a resolution of a dissonance occurs, the version with long accents only can be considered an equivalent variant. In EE and GE2 (→GE3) there are short accents only. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE inaccuracies |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 67
|
composition: Op. 22, Andante spianato
..
The presence of dolce in EE may be explained by a revision, in this case not based on a comparison with an analogous place. It is also likely that it is an authentic, earlier indication, removed in FE (→EE) in the last phase of proofreading. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 68-96
|
composition: Op. 22, Andante spianato
..
EE added cautionary sharps before the f category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 72-73
|
composition: Op. 22, Andante spianato
..
In FE (→GE) the slur led as far as to b. 73 must be an inaccuracy of the engraver, perhaps provoked by careless notation of [A]. In EE the slur was shortened in accordance with the musical sense and the analogous situation in b. 84-85. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 73-75
|
composition: Op. 22, Andante spianato
..
Due to a possible presence of long accents in b. 67 and 70 in FE, we interpret the remaining marks in this section as short accents. We interpret all accents in GE1 as long, just like before. Here and in the entire Semplice EE and later GE include short accents only. The missing bottom accent in b. 75 in EE1 is probably a revision, withdrawn in EE2. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
notes in b. 68, 71, 80, 92 and 95 and f
