mUltimate Chopin

Op. 22, Andante spianato

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 113

composition: Op. 22, Andante spianato

Small quaver in FE (→GE1) & GE2 (→GE3)

Small crotchet in EE & GE1a
..

The version of EE is almost certainly a mistake: oversight of the quaver flag. In GE1a flags were overlooked next to the last two notes of the bar, which is a side effect of the graphical retouches in this fragment of the page. The mistake was not repeated in GE2 (→GE3).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in EE , Errors resulting from corrections , Errors in GE

b. 113

composition: Op. 22, Andante spianato

..

In GE there are no dots extending the c1-f1 minim. It must be a mistake of the engraver of GE1, corrected neither in subsequent impressions nor in GE2 (→GE3).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE

b. 113

composition: Op. 22, Andante spianato

No mark in FE (→GE)

Short accent in EE
..

In terms of music, the accent added in EE is very justified: cf. analogous b. 96. However, it is absent in FE (→GE), and we keep this sparing notation in the main text believing that Chopin could have imagined this short recall of the Semplice section at the end of the piece with subdued, more delicate accents.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions