|
b. 48
|
composition: Op. 22, Andante spianato
..
EE include the original version of this place, completed by Chopin in the last phase of proofreading of FE (→GE): in FE in the place of the grace note there is a trace of removal of the category imprint: Editorial revisions; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
|
b. 50
|
composition: Op. 22, Andante spianato
..
FE feature accellerando (with doubled 'l') in this place. The mistake, certainly coming from Chopin (cf., e.g. the Impromptu in A category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Errors repeated in FE |
||||||||
|
b. 52
|
composition: Op. 22, Andante spianato
..
Arbitrary changes of horizontal accents to vertical ones belong to characteristic, frequent revisions of EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 52
|
composition: Op. 22, Andante spianato
..
The change of the staccato mark is a frequent discretion of GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 52
|
composition: Op. 22, Andante spianato
..
In the main text we begin the slur in accordance with the most likely interpretation of FE (→GE1,EE). However, it is not a guarantee that the interpretation of [A] would have yielded the same result, hence the version of GE2 (→GE3), although being a result of a revision, may be considered a potentially authentic variant. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
raising c2 to c
2. By adding a grace note before the chord, Chopin would have probably meant one of his favourite means: arpeggio with repeated bottom note; however, there was no place left for the arpeggio's wavy line. Due to the above reason, we explicitly insert an arpeggio sign in the main text.
Major, Op. 29, 
