Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 78-90

composition: Op. 22, Andante spianato

Notation in sources

Notation suggested by the editors

..

The sparing Chopinesque notation in b. 78 and 90 – no clear indication that the last crotchet still falls within the minim – may be misleading and it actually misled the engraver of FE, who laid out 3 beats of each of these bars as if they were 4/4 bars (see FE in the version 'transcription'). The erroneous layout was not repeated in GE and EE, yet in EE an extending dot next to the g minim was added, which means that the engraver counted four beats in this bar (the erroneous dot was removed in EE2). In the main text, in order to avoid doubts, we specify the mutual relation between the L.H. voices.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Inaccuracies in FE

b. 78

composition: Op. 22, Andante spianato

Short accents in FE (→EE) & GE2 (→GE3)

Long accents in GE1

..

In accordance with the adopted assumptions concerning the interpretation of the accents in Andante, we reproduce the marks on the 2nd beat of the bar as short in FE (→EE) and long in GE. Both versions can be considered equal. There is a similar situation in b. 90.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Long accents

b. 78-90

composition: Op. 22, Andante spianato

Short accents in FE (→EE) & GE2 (→GE3)

Long accents in GE1

..

In GE1 the accent on the 3rd beat of b. 78 is slightly shorter than the one on the second; however, the difference is probably of accidental nature – in analogous b. 90 the marks are identical – hence we do not include it in the transcription of this source. The choice of the accent's length is left to the discretion of the performer, since the sources are inconclusive here – just like in the entire Semplice – as to which marks Chopin meant.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Long accents

b. 78-90

composition: Op. 22, Andante spianato

..

In the main text we omit the cautionary  before f in b. 78, present in all sources, and add a  before c1. We also add a natural in analogous b. 90. Additions in b. 90 were also performed in EE, by adding a , and in GE3, by adding a .

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals , Last key signature sign

b. 79-94

composition: Op. 22, Andante spianato

4 short accents in FE (→EE) & GE2 (→GE3)

4 long accents in GE1

..

In b. 79, 82, 91 and 94 we give long accents in the main text after the probably authentic long accents in b. 67 and 70. We interpret the marks in FE and GE, which can be read both as short and long accents, in accordance with the assumptions for the entire Andante.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Long accents