|
b. 52
|
composition: Op. 22, Andante spianato
..
In the main text we omit the most probably authentic cautionary category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Cautionary accidentals |
|||||
|
b. 52
|
composition: Op. 22, Andante spianato
..
In the main text we add a cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 52
|
composition: Op. 22, Andante spianato
..
None of the sources features the category imprint: Interpretations within context issues: Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in EE |
|||||
|
b. 53
|
composition: Op. 22, Andante spianato
..
The missing Chopinesque fingering in EE may indicate that it was added in the last phase of proofreading of FE. The digits were added in EE2 most probably on the basis of the finished FE or GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
|
b. 53
|
composition: Op. 22, Andante spianato
..
In the main text we add a cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions |
before G, the 9th L.H. semiquaver. It is difficult to assume that anyone could have doubts concerning the sound of this ostinato figure after it having been repeated several dozen times.
before f
2 in the 2nd half of the bar.
lowering e2 to e
2 on the 8th semiquaver of the bar. In such situations, when an accidental has already appeared at the same pitch yet under an octave sign, both Chopin and his publishers would often consider it to be valid. The inaccuracy, certainly repeated after [A], does not result in any textual doubts and is indeed hardly noticeable.
