|
b. 169-170
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text we reproduce precisely the notation of A, since it seems to be unlikely that Chopin would like to combine these slurs in one – see bars 171-172. The version of GE (→FE) can be considered to be an acceptable interpretation of the notation of A. The version of EE, unified with the notation of analogous bars 172 and 174, adopted from FE, must be – in the light of the notation of A – considered erroneous. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 169-170
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The absence of the slur over (under) the triplet in bar 170 is certainly Chopin's oversight, who overlooked the entire marking of the triplet – digit and slur. In the main text we add both. In GE1 (→FE) the two-note slur of A was replaced with a longer one, embracing the entire motif. It seems to be likely that it is Chopin's proofreading, although one can have doubts whether a possible entry of the composer in the proof copy was reproduced correctly: Chopin could have been thinking of a shorter slur, like in GE2. The version of EE is certainly arbitrary. We give a more detailed analysis of the slurs of both hands in these and analogous bars in bars 171-172. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions , Errors of A , Authentic corrections of GE |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 170
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 170
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text we assume that the slur (or slurs) begin only in bar 171. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 171
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
category imprint: Differences between sources |
