|
b. 28
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
In a proofreading of GE (→FE→EE) Chopin removed the second out of four small semiquavers written in A, most probably, however, it was an erroneously engraved a category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Errors in GE , Terzverschreibung error , Authentic corrections of GE |
|||||
|
b. 28
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The less pianistically convenient c2 instead of e category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Terzverschreibung error |
|||||
|
b. 28
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
In the main text we add a cautionary category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||
|
b. 28
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
In EE the group of 27 demisemiquavers was written with small notes, most probably in order to save space. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 29-31
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The slurs in A begin from the 2nd quaver of each half-bar figure (only the slur in bar 31 may raise doubts). It is unclear how the change of their range occurred in GE1 (→FE→EE): in the case of a few of them one may assume extension of slurs in print (adding slurs in the 2nd half of bar 31 was a patent intervention). Not being certain whether the changes were performed in consultation with Chopin, in the main text we preserve the slurring of A (restored in GE2). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of GE |
1. In spite of the fact that Chopin's intention of removing the correct note (f1) was not explicitly expressed in this situation, a reduced number of notes in this ornament remains a fact. Due to this reason, in the main text we give the version of the editions.
before a
