|
b. 158
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In A Chopin overlooked two naturals necessary on the 4th quaver in the bar (a and e1). GE1 (→FE→EE) added a category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |
|||||
|
b. 159-161
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In bars 159-164, differentiation between long and short accents is unclear in A, yet the first three signs are evidently bigger or longer than the next two (see also bar 164). Since in an analogous fragment in the recapitulation (bars 309-314) the differences are entirely clear, in the main text we give here long accents too. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in A |
|||||
|
b. 159
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In the 2nd half of the bar, Chopin overlooked naturals in A – undoubtedly necessary – before the 2nd and 3rd quavers in the L.H. In GE1 (→FE) a sign was added before e1, while in EE and GE2 also the one before a. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |
|||||
|
b. 159
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In GE1 (→FE→EE), the fact of embracing both four-quaver figures of the accompaniment with half-bar slurs is a typical example of the schematic approach of the engraver of GE1. GE2 returned the notation of A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 160-161
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text we add a cautionary category imprint: Editorial revisions |
raising a
to a. 
