Issues : GE revisions
b. 327
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||||||||||
b. 328
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In A there is no lowering g2 to g2 before the 8th semiquaver. Chopin's patent oversight was corrected already in GE1. In such a situation, a should be added before g3, appearing three semiquavers later at the same pitch, which was not done until in FE (→EE) and GE2. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , Authentic corrections of GE , Inaccuracies in A |
|||||||||||||
b. 328-329
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The division of the slur in GE (→FE), as a result of which the 2nd half in bar 328 is not embraced with a slur at all, is undoubtedly a mistake of the engraver of GE1. The version of FE – without a slur in bar 329 – can be interpreted as an oversight of FE or as a notation of the state of GE1 from before the final retouch. In the second case, the slur of GE1 in bar 329 would be an inaccurate attempt to alleviate the consequences of omission of the final one-and-a-half-bar fragment of the slur. A suitable completion of the slur, this time accurate, was introduced in EE. See also the note on the slur in the L.H. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||||
b. 328-329
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The slur over the final section of the passage in the L.H. written on the bottom stave is most probably an addition of the revision of GE1 (→FE→EE). In turn, moving the beginning of this slur to bar 327, introduced in GE2, is undoubtedly a revision. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of GE |
|||||||||||||
b. 335
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The trilled note in A is an erroneous c2. A similar mistake, consisting in writing the upper second of the trilled note instead of the trilled note, while the performance of the trill begins from the upper second, was committed by Chopin also in the Bolero, Op. 19, bar 187 and in the Sonata in B minor, 3rd mov., bar 20. In GE1 (→FE→EE) the error was corrected, probably by Chopin, whereas GE2 returned to the erroneous text of A. See also the note in the next bar. In the main text we add a cautionary before b1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Errors of A , Authentic corrections of GE |