Issues : GE revisions
b. 299-300
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In A Chopin forgot to return the bass clef in bar 300. GE1 overlooked also the treble clef in bar 299. The mistakes were corrected – perhaps by Chopin – in FE (→EE). GE2 also includes the correct text. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Errors of A , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||
b. 300
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
It is difficult to say how the replacement of the slurs of A, natural in this context, with one whole-bar slur in GE1 (→FE→EE) occurred. One of the possibilities is Chopin's proofreading, but leaving accents on every second note results in the fact that the effect of the change of slurring is barely aurally perceptible. Therefore, in the main text we adopt the undoubtedly authentic slurs of A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of GE |
|||
b. 301
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
|||
b. 301
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||
b. 302-304
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In bars 302 and 304, Chopin placed a natural before the b2 crotchet in A (→GE1→FE→EE). In the main text we omit those superfluous signs. The naturals were removed also in GE2. The signs reveal Chopin's way of thinking, considering the top and bottom voices independently – cf. the 3rd mov. of the Concerto, bar 422. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals |