Issues : GE revisions

b. 306-308

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

Slurs from 2nd quaver in A & GE2

Slurs from 1st quaver in GE1 (→FEEE)

..

Starting the slurs in bars 306 and 308 already from the beginning of the bar is a typical inaccuracy of GE1 (→FEEE). Slurs compliant with A were restored in GE2.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions

b. 308

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

..

In A there are no naturals before a2a(in both hands) and the dsemiquaver. In GE (→FE) a  was added only in the L.H.; EE includes the correct text.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Inaccuracies in A

b. 308

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

Staccato in A & GE2

No mark in GE1 (→FEEE)

..

The omission of the staccato dot in GE1 (→FEEE) is certainly a mistake. The sign was added in GE2 after A.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions

b. 309

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

..

In A there is no  raising a to before the 2nd quaver. The sign was added in EE and GE2.
In EE the  before the 3rd quaver (e1) was overlooked.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Errors in EE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Inaccuracies in A

b. 309

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

Different slurs in A

Half-bar slurs in GE1

No slurs in FE

Slurs from 2nd quaver in EE & GE2

..

In the 1st half of the bar the slur in the L.H. was corrected in A – it was most probably Chopin that added a new beginning to the original slur over the entire group of quavers, so that the corrected slur would start from the 2nd quaver. GE1 did not include this correction, whereas GE2 copied it also in the second slur in this bar. The absence of slurs in FE is a patent oversight, which was revised in EE, by providing with slurs the notes which were not marked staccato. The last version may be considered to be justified, yet due to a likely though unobvious inaccuracies in the notation of the articulation of the L.H. in bars 309-310, in the main text we leave the version of A

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Inaccuracies in GE , Corrections in A , GE revisions