Issues : Errors in GE

b. 189

composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II

Dots, accent &  in GC (contextual interpretation) & FE (→EE)

No marks in GC (literal reading→GE)

..

The absence of articulation and dynamic indications in GE is a result of misunderstanding of the abbreviated notation of GC.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE

b. 200-202

composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II

Two pedals in GC & GE2

One pedal in GE1

Three pedals in FE

Three pedals in EE

Our variant suggestion

..

The pedalling of GE1 and EE is most probably an inaccurate reproduction of their base texts – GC and FE respectively. The discussion on the versions of the latter – see bars 13-14

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies

b. 239-242

composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II

..

The pedalling of these bars in FE and GE1 includes mistakes and inaccuracies:

  • in FE there is no  sign in bar 241 (a patent mistake);
  • in GE1 there are no  signs in bars 239-240 and the entire pedalling in bars 241-242 (and subsequent ones).

We give the unambiguous indications of GC and EE and GE2.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in GE , GE revisions

b. 242

composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II

No sharps in GC (→GE) & FE1 (→FE2EE1)

Sharps in FE3 (→FE4) & EE2

..

Same as in bar 54, we include in the main text the sharps raising the f1-f2 grace note to f1-f2, added – most probably by Chopin – in the proofreading of FE3 (→FE4). The change was introduced also in EE2.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Errors in GE , Omission of current key accidentals , Authentic corrections of FE , Errors of GC

b. 243-244

composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II

No  in GC & GE2

 in bar 244 in FE (→EE)

No pedalling in GE1

Our alternative suggestion

..

In the main text, we give a  sign on the basis of FE (→EE), as these are the only sources, in which the asterisk is present at all (in GE1 the  sign was also overlooked). Our alternative suggestion is an asterisk [] in a place in which it was added – probably by Chopin in the base text to EE – at the first appearance of this place (bars 55-56).  

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , FE revisions