Slurs
b. 114-115
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GC |
||||||||
b. 115-119
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major
..
In FE the slur in the middle voice breaks at the end of line (in bar 115). GE overlooked the entire slur, despite an unambiguous and clear notation of GC. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors in GE , Uncertain slur continuation |
||||||||
b. 116-117
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major
..
The additional tie to d1 results either from a mistake, or from an unconsidered revision by the copyist in GC (→GE) – that note belongs to the first theme of the Ballade, and of course must be played. The lack of ties in FE1 (→FE2) and EE is probably due to the misunderstanding of A. In FE3 the ties were most probably added by a reviser on the basis of A, although we cannot exclude Chopin's participation in this kind of correction. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Authentic corrections of FE , Errors of GC |
||||||||
b. 117
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major
..
EE overlooks the tie sustaining b in the R.H. category imprint: Interpretations within context issues: Errors in EE |
||||||||
b. 119-120
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major
..
Nothing indicates that the delayed start of slur In FE and GE could be authentic. The engravers or revisers possibly tried to avoid beginning a slur on a tied note. In case of GE, the inauthentic slur could have resulted from the inaccurate notation of GC wherein bar 120 starts a new line with a slur running from the first note, therefore as in GE. However, this does not justify omitting the clearly written opening fragment of the slur in bar 119. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , FE revisions |