Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Slurs
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


Slurs

b. 114-115

composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major

Slur to A1-A in A (→FE,EE)

Slur to B1-B in GC (→GE)

..

The shorter slur in GC (→GE) is almost certainly a consequence of the copyist's negligence.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GC

b. 115-119

composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major

Slur in bars 115-119 in A (→GC,EE)

Slur in bar 115 in FE

No slur in GE

..

In FE the slur in the middle voice breaks at the end of line (in bar 115). GE overlooked the entire slur, despite an unambiguous and clear notation of GC.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE , Errors in GE , Uncertain slur continuation

b. 116-117

composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major

2 ties in A & FE3

3 ties in GC (→GE)

No ties in FE1 (→FE2) & EE

..

The additional tie to d1 results either from a mistake, or from an unconsidered revision by the copyist in GC (→GE) – that note belongs to the first theme of the Ballade, and of course must be played. The lack of ties in FE1 (→FE2) and EE is probably due to the misunderstanding of A. In FE3 the ties were most probably added by a reviser on the basis of A, although we cannot exclude Chopin's participation in this kind of correction.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Authentic corrections of FE , Errors of GC

b. 117

composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major

b1 tied in A (→FE,GCGE)

b1 repeated in EE

..

EE overlooks the tie sustaining in the R.H.

category imprint: Interpretations within context

issues: Errors in EE

b. 119-120

composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major

Beginning of slur in A (→GC,EE)

Beginning of slur in FE

Beginning of slur in GE

..

Nothing indicates that the delayed start of slur In FE and GE could be authentic. The engravers or revisers possibly tried to avoid beginning a slur on a tied note. In case of GE, the inauthentic slur could have resulted from the inaccurate notation of GC wherein bar 120 starts a new line with a slur running from the first note, therefore as in GE. However, this does not justify omitting the clearly written opening fragment of the slur in bar 119.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions , FE revisions