|
b. 47-49
|
composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor
..
In the main text we reproduce the fingering written in bar 47 in A (→FE). The arrangement of the digits under or above the notes indicates a division between the hands, which was misinterpreted in GE. Fontana also did not include (did not understand?) this hint in EE, suggesting a different division and repeating his own indications in bars 48-49 (except the first note in bar 49). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||
|
b. 47-49
|
composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor
..
A does not include slurs in bars 47-48, while the slur in bar 49 is unclear and blurred. The slurs adopted in the main text were added by Chopin in a proofreading of FE (→EE,GE1→GE2). In subsequent GE,s the slurs in bars 47-48 were overlooked, which is most probably a mistake. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||
|
b. 47-48
|
composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor
..
In EE2 there are no naturals raising d category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
||||||
|
b. 48
|
composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor
..
In FE the dots extending the c category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 49
|
composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
1 to d1 on the 2nd beat of each of these bars. This patent oversight is the most significant defect of this edition.
