b. 45
|
composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor
..
The overlooked dot extending the e1 minim in A was added only in GE2 (→GE3→GE4→GE5). It is not a rhythmic mistake sensu stricto, yet the comparison with analogous bars 5 and 13 prove Chopin's error. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |
|||||||
b. 46
|
composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor
..
Chopin wrote here d1-g1 on one stem, which probably contributed to the omission of the dot extending d1 in FE (→EE,GE1→GE2→GE3). In GE4 (→GE5) a more accurate notation was applied in this bar, used by Chopin in analogous bars 6 and 14. We adopt this solution in the main text. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||
b. 46
|
composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor
..
We add a cautionary before g1. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||||
b. 46
|
composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor
..
In A there is no returning g, which is a patent error, corrected in a proofreading of FE (→GE,EE). Cf. bars 6 and 14. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors of A , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||
b. 47-48
|
composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor
..
In A the hairpins clearly refer to short melodic connecting passages leading to the Neapolitan chord. In FE the marks were extended and their reference to the part of the R.H. is unsure. According to us, it is a result of the engraver's misunderstanding of the manuscript. In EE and subsequent GE,s, the mark in bar 48 was extended after bar 47. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies |