mUltimate Chopin

Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor

Text Compare Notes Sources Description

Issues : Errors in EE

Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 6-7

composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor

Long accents in A

Different accents in FE & EE3 (→EE4)

One accent in EE2

Short accents in GE
..

Two long accents visible in A were reproduced in FE (→EE; in EE2 the accent in bar 7 was overlooked) in varied ways. GE includes short accents in both bars. There is no reason to assume that Chopin interfered with any of the versions.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in EE

b. 32

composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor

 in A (→FE→GE1→GE2)

No sign in EE2

Long accent in EE3 (→EE4)

 in GE3 (→GE4→GE5)
..

In EE2 the  mark was omitted and in EE3 (→EE4) it was added in the form of a long accent over the octave in the L.H. In GE3 (→GE4→GE5) the hairpins occupy the entire 1st half of the bar.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in EE

b. 38-39

composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor

Long accents in A

Short accents in FE (→GE)

Short accent in EE
..

The accents in A are undoubtedly long here, which was, however, erroneously reproduced in FE (→GE). In EE the second mark was omitted, certainly by accident.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in EE

b. 47-48

composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor

..

In EE2 there are no naturals raising d1 to d1 on the 2nd beat of each of these bars. This patent oversight is the most significant defect of this edition.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in EE