b. 42
|
composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor
..
The overlooked in FE (→EE2,GE1→GE2) tie sustaining e1 was added in the remaining editions. The sign was also added in FEJ. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Annotations in FEJ |
||||||||
b. 43-48
|
composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor
..
We interpret the accents of A in bars 43, 46-48 as long ones. In the editions they were generally reproduced as short, while the mark in bar 48 was totally omitted (the engraver's distraction – see the remark on the rhythmic error). category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
||||||||
b. 44-45
|
composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor
..
The missing tie sustaining g in A is most probably Chopin's mistake, who added it in a proofreading of FE (→GE,EE). Cf. bars 12-13. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of A , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
b. 45-46
|
composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor
..
In the main text we give the fingering added by Chopin in FES. The 1st finger on e1 in bar 45 is also copied in A. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
b. 45
|
composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor
..
Allegedly, the mark of A was supposed to have a similar range as in the significantly less carefully written bars 5 and 13. The notation of A shows signs of underdevelopment and haste in this aspect, e.g., lack of the tie sustaining g (while the tie of e1 is marked only in bar 44, at the end of the line), lack of the dot extending the e1 minim, lack of the returning g in bar 46. Therefore, in the main text we suggest the indications used by Chopin in bars 5 and 13. The character of the hairpins in FE (→GE1,EE) is actually the one of a long accent nature, yet it is uncertain whether their arrangement in the 1st half of the bar was a result of Chopin's intervention or of the engraver's inaccuracy. In subsequent GE,s the mark was arbitrarily extended with an unexpected consistency (which is averaged by us). category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Authentic corrections of FE |