|
b. 38-40
|
composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor
..
In EE, at the beginning of each of these bars, Fontana added the fingering based on the one by Chopin from bar 17. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 39
|
composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor
..
The cautionary flats before the octave in the L.H. and b category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Cautionary accidentals , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
|
b. 39-40
|
composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor
..
The slur of A in bar 39 unanimously suggests a continuation, which is, however, not confirmed in bar 40, on a new page, where the slur is missing. In FE the slur was correctly reproduced in terms of graphics, yet it is hard to assume that Chopin had such a slur in mind. Both in GE and EE the slur was extended in such a way to dissipate the doubts concerning its scope. We suggest a different interpretation. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccurate slurs in A |
||||||
|
b. 40
|
composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor
..
The vague mark in A may be interpreted as a slur. It seems that Chopin went out of ink at the time of writing, however, he did not take care of a discernible notation in A, nor did he add the slur while proofreading FE. Therefore, we do not include this mark in the main text. In EE3 (→EE4) a whole-bar long slur was added under the semiquavers. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccurate slurs in A |
||||||
|
b. 40
|
composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor
..
Extension of the marks in the editions stem from the engravers' inaccuracy and manners. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
in the R.H. were added in a proofreading of 
in 
