Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 97-98

composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV

  in A

No signs in GE (→FE,EE,IE)

..

The missing pair of the   marks must be an oversight by the engraver of GE (→FE,EE,IE).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE

b. 98-99

composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV

..

In the main text we add cautionary naturals to c1 in bar 98 and the first c in bar 99.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 98

composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV

  in A

Longer   in GE (→FE,EE,IE)

..

In the main text we keep the range of the   hairpins visible in A. In GE (→FE,EE,IE) the range of both marks was adjusted to the quaver beams, which, in this case, does not significantly influence the meaning of these marks.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins , GE revisions

b. 99

composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV

g tied in A (→GEFE,IE) & EE2

g repeated in EE1

..

The missing tie to g must be a mistake by the engraver of EE1, corrected in EE2.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE

b. 99-100

composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV

Slur to b. 100 in A

Slur to end of b. 99 in GE

Slur to f in FE, EE & IE

..

In GE the ending of the slur in bar 99 (at the end of a line) can be considered a tenuto slur. However, it is most probably an inaccuracy – the slur was either supposed to reach bar 100, as it is in A, or the f crotchet, as it was unanimously interpreted in the remaining editions.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies , Tenuto slurs ,