b. 110
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
In GE (→FE,EE,IE) the unquestionable long accent (considering the context) – cf. analogous bar 114 – was literally reproduced as a half-bar . category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
|||||
b. 111
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
The version of the editions can be regarded as justified and considered an acceptable variant – in A the discussed bar opens a new line, and it cannot be ruled out that Chopin forgot to write accents there. In the main text we keep the A notation, as the accents in the preceding bar can be considered models for the entire ascending sequence; moreover, taking into account the crescendo, a performance featuring accents is obvious. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||
b. 111
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
In A there is no accidental to the top note of the sixth. The patent inaccuracy was corrected in GE (→FE,EE,IE). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |
|||||
b. 112-113
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
In A in the R.H. top voice the accidentals to the first quavers in each pair in bar 112 (a3 and f3) are missing, as well as to the penultimate quaver in bar 113 (b2). The patent inaccuracies were corrected in GE (→FE,EE,IE). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 114
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
The notation of the 1st crotchet in A is ambiguous – it is uncertain whether the top note (g2) is supposed to be provided with a separate stem pointing upwards, as it was interpreted in GE (→FE,EE,IE), or whether this "stem" is actually a wedge over the sixth in one-part writing. To the main text we adopt the latter, yet the version of the editions can be considered an equal variant. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Wedges , Inaccuracies in A |