data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
b. 115
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
In EE there should be an octave doubling of the c note in the L.H. – such a notation could certainly be present in the base text of EE. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||
b. 115-117
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
EE has an additional legato slur in the L.H. in bars 115-117. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||
b. 115
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
The arpeggio in the L.H. was probably overlooked in FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
||||
b. 117-119
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
In FE the slur in bars 117-119 was omitted. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
||||
b. 117
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
The clear staccato dot in A was recreated in GE. FE has a wedge; it cannot be excluded that such a sign could have been in the lost base text. In the editions we generally have a situation in which the wedges written by Chopin were most frequently interpreted as dots. In EE the sign was overlooked. category imprint: Differences between sources |