Issues : EE inaccuracies
|
b. 11-12
|
composition: Op. 25 No 1, Etude in A♭ major
..
The broken slur of EE may result from misunderstanding of the manuscript, perhaps inaccurate. In A, bar 11 closes the line; this layout, conducive to ambiguities in the slurs' notation, was probably repeated in the manuscripts which served as base texts for FE and EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE inaccuracies |
||||||||
|
b. 11-12
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
No accents in GC (→GE) is almost certainly an oversight of the copyist, who overlooked all signs between the staves in bars 7-13. The short accents in EE are certainly a result of the standard interpretation of the notation of FE. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE inaccuracies , Errors of GC |
||||||||
|
b. 11
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In the main text we keep the notation of A (→GE→FE1→FE2), in which the slur starts from the tied d4 demisemiquaver. Chopin would often apply such a type of notation of slurs throughout his entire life. The equivalent notation of EE and FESB probably reflects the individual preferences of the engravers of those editions. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies |
||||||||
|
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies |
||||||||
|
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
No category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies |
in 