|
b. 560-561
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The slurs of EE are an arbitrary addition of the reviser. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||||||
|
b. 560
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||||||
|
b. 560-579
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The slurs encompassing the ostinato quaver figures in A are of different length: some reach the following crotchet, some do not. Statistically, it is the former that clearly prevail: 8 longer, 6-note slurs to only 4 shorter and 3 questionable ones (we interpret the questionable ones literally as short). The remaining sources do not show traces of Chopin's influence on the range of those slurs; except for minor inaccuracies, FC and GE1 reproduce the text of their Stichvorlagen, while FE (→EE) contain longer slurs only (we discuss b. 574-575 separately due to FE having overlooked the slur). In this situation, we base the main text on the above analysis of the notation of A; taking into account a high degree of structural and functional similarity of the discussed motifs, we suggest uniform, 6-note slurs in all figures. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies , Uncertain slur continuation |
||||||||||||
|
b. 561
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE, there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors repeated in EE |
||||||||||||
|
b. 561-566
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The slurs of EE added in b. 561-562 and 565-566 are contrary to Chopin's intention. It is proven by the same type of slurs having been crossed out in A in the first of those places. According to us, it is even uncertain whether the slurs were an actual original concept of articulation of those motifs, since Chopin could have erroneously marked one similar place too many while adding slurs on that page of A. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , Corrections in A , Deletions in A |
raising c3 to c
3. The patent mistake was corrected in 
restoring g3, necessary in this context, even as a cautionary accidental, was added only in 
