data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
In FE, there is no raising c3 to c
3. The patent mistake was corrected in GE and EE. In turn, the missing
restoring g3, necessary in this context, even as a cautionary accidental, was added only in GE.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources
issues: EE revisions, Errors in FE, Omissions to cancel alteration, GE revisions, Omission of current key accidentals, Errors repeated in EE
notation: Pitch