



b. 562
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In FE at the end of this bar there is additional category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: Errors in FE |
|||||
b. 562-563
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The division of the slur, not related in any way to the course of music, must be an inaccuracy. In the main text, we suggest a continuous slur modelled after the slur in analogous bars 211-214. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||
b. 562
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The majority of the sources include naturals before the b1 and b2 notes. It is difficult to say what made Chopin write them – the only alteration in the vicinity of those notes is b category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals |
|||||
b. 562-564
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The presence of arpeggios both in b. 560 and 566 makes us consider their absence in b. 562 and 564 to be Chopin's oversight. Therefore, in the main text we suggest adding the signs. The arpeggios were added in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
|||||
b. 563-564
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
Additional change of the pedal in EE is most probably authentic. However, for the main text we adopt the consistent GC and FE version, as the two sources most probably based on Chopin's autograph. category imprint: Differences between sources |