



b. 376-378
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In this case, the easiest explanation for the longer phrase mark of FC (→GE) is a mistake resulting from the change of division of the text into lines. The phrase mark in A reaches almost the end of the line, since b. 377, which ends it, is very tight. The copyist wrote an entire phrase in that line, until b. 378, and wrote a phrase mark whose range was similar to A, yet measured in relation to the end of the line. The ending of the tie of c category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FC |
||||||||
b. 376-377
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
The missing L.H. slur probably resulted from lack of space in GE1. It does not really matter, since Chopin himself would often write only one slur over parts of both hands written down together on one stave, considering it to be valid for both hands – cf., e.g. the Ballade in G minor, Op. 23, bars 1-5. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||||
b. 376-377
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In GE (→EE) the slur starting in bar 376, which ends a line, clearly suggests that it should be continued; however, there is no ending thereof in bar 377. In FE and FESB the slur was led only to the last semiquaver in bar 376, interpreting the notation of GE as an inaccurate ending of the slur. We interpret it similarly in the content transcription of GE and EE. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources |
||||||||
b. 376
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
When interpreted literally, the R.H. slur starts in A from the 4th semiquaver in the bar. It must be an inaccuracy (cf. the L.H. slur), probably caused by ink stoppage. It was already in GE1 that this situation was evaluated properly, hence in all editions the range of this slur is correct. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccurate slurs in A |
||||||||
b. 376-378
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
In bar 376 and 378 in the main text we keep the notation of the A slurs, as the comparison with analogous bar 10, 12 and 193 shows that Chopin – although he did not mark it here – most probably envisioned the initial octave to be performed staccato. However, one can understand the engraver of GE, who considered the A notation to be another case of inaccurate slurs (particularly the slur in bar 378, the ending of which is certainly inaccurate). category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions |