|
b. 373
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In FE (→GE1→GE2), the missing dot prolonging the c3 crotchet seems to be an inaccuracy of notation, since that note is naturally continued by b2 at the beginning of the next bar. There is no reason (also pianistic) to break the two-part notation. The dot was added already in EE and GE3. There is a similar situation in bar 377. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 373
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In GE1 (→FE1,EE1) the last semiquaver is a2. The patent mistake – cf. analogous bar 271 – was corrected in FE2, probably at Chopin's request, and in GE2 (→GE3,FESB) and EE2 (→EE3). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
|
b. 373-375
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In the main text, we add cautionary flats before b category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 373
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
As in bar 7, in the 2nd half of the bar there are no accidentals in A, while the sharps raising all f notes (in different octaves) to f category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 373
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
In the main text we include the arpeggio added in GE (→FE,EE,IE). It is difficult to assume that Chopin would have omitted it on purpose here, as he marked arpeggios both in a few previous chords in this phrase and before a respective chord in both previous appearances of this theme (bar 7 and 190). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
2 in bar 373 and b
2, f
), f1, f suggested by the editors
