|
b. 561-566
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The slurs of EE added in b. 561-562 and 565-566 are contrary to Chopin's intention. It is proven by the same type of slurs having been crossed out in A in the first of those places. According to us, it is even uncertain whether the slurs were an actual original concept of articulation of those motifs, since Chopin could have erroneously marked one similar place too many while adding slurs on that page of A. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , Corrections in A , Deletions in A |
||||||
|
b. 562
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In FE at the end of this bar there is additional category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: Errors in FE |
||||||
|
b. 562-563
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The division of the slur, not related in any way to the course of music, must be an inaccuracy. In the main text, we suggest a continuous slur modelled after the slur in analogous bars 211-214. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||
|
b. 562
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The majority of the sources include naturals before the b1 and b2 notes. It is difficult to say what made Chopin write them – the only alteration in the vicinity of those notes is b category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals |
||||||
|
b. 562-564
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The presence of arpeggios both in b. 560 and 566 makes us consider their absence in b. 562 and 564 to be Chopin's oversight. Therefore, in the main text we suggest adding the signs. The arpeggios were added in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
mark. It is with most certainty a mistake, however, it is difficult to unequivocally determine what the correct text would look like. Since the notation of the remaining sources leaves no doubts and is consistent, we adopt it for the main text.
1(2) in the next figure. The superfluous accidentals were removed in 
