|
b. 352-353
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The fingering of FEH partially repeats and complements the printed Chopinesque indications, determining their most natural continuation. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||||
|
b. 352
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
The second slur in the bottom voice is barely visible in A – the beginning blends in with the stave, while the ending is probably inaccurate, as there is no reason for the range of these two slurs to differ. Due to the above, in the main text we standardise them after the first one. In GE (→FE,EE) it was only the first slur that was reproduced (inaccurately). In IE in the 2nd half of the bar a slur modelled after the 1st half was added. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccurate slurs in A , |
|||||||||||
|
b. 353-360
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
Same as in bars 177-189, in the main text we give indications – slurs and dots – introduced probably by Chopin in the proofreading of GE (→FE→EE). In A, in this fragment, written already very hastily, slurs are only in bar 353 (over the sixths) and 357 (a whole-bar slur). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of GE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 353
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text, we suggest adding an indication returning the regular course of music after a temporary halt. In this section of A, Chopin omitted a number of agogic markings, including all a tempo markings – cf. bars 313, 317 and 325. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||||||||
|
b. 353
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
It is unclear how the two slurs in A are to be understood: their range is practically identical. Therefore, it seems that Chopin either wrote one of them by mistake or wanted to replace one of them with another. This is how it was interpreted in GE, reproducing only the top slur. We give this version in the main text, since all following similar figures have only one slur, mostly the top one. The absence of the slur in FE must be a mistake, corrected in EE, probably on the basis of comparison with analogous bars. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
