b. 555
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In EE placement of must have resulted from inaccurate interpretation of the basis/manuscript. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE inaccuracies |
|||||
b. 555
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The sharp before the last semiquaver in FE is almost certainly a mistake – it is proved by comparison with analogous bar 196, 200 and 551, supported by deletion of the unnecessary accidental in FEJ. The awkward e2-d2 sequence, omitting the chordal e2, drew the attention of both the revisers of GE and EE. The traces of corrections visible in FE prove that the discussed note was corrected from d2 to e2, which allows us, to a certain extent, understand the mechanism of the mistake – the proofreading was definitely aimed at e2, yet along with a notehead, the engraver erroneously moved also the (cf. the Sonata in B Minor, Op. 35, 3rd mov., bar 20). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors resulting from corrections , GE revisions , Annotations in FEJ |
|||||
b. 555
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
Three subsequent marks are to be understood as long accents – cf. (short) accents in the previous analogous bars. In the main text, we give them such a form, probably consistent with the notation of [A]. category imprint: Interpretations within context issues: Long accents |
|||||
b. 555
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we add a cautionary before e3. The accidental was added in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
|||||
b. 555
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources |