b. 555-558
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The missing three-note R.H. slurs in b. 555-556 and 557-558 must be a mistake of EE. Generally, EE include a few slurring irregularities in this fragment that are difficult to explain; see also b. 557-560, 561-566. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
|||||||||
b. 556
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we present the GC and GE2 pedalling, the only sources where these marks are notated without mistakes or inaccuracies. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in GE , EE inaccuracies |
|||||||||
b. 556
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the version of GE1 (→GE2), the first 4 notes and rest constitute an unmarked semiquaver quintuplet. Nothing points to authenticity of that version, although it is practically very close to the actual performance – see the commentary to the Scherzo in C Minor, Op. 39, bar 47. The version of GE3 was probably introduced on the basis of analogy with similar bars of exposition. Like in bar 197, 199 and 201, in FE one can see traces of swapping rhythmic values of the 2nd and 3rd notes – initially, the 2nd note was a semiquaver, whereas the 3rd one – a demisemiquaver. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , Inserted rest |
|||||||||
b. 556-572
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I category imprint: |
|||||||||
b. 556
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources |