b. 465
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
According to us, leaving the last group of semiquavers without a slur is an inaccuracy – of Chopin in [A] or of the engraver of FE (→GE,EE) – cf. bar 463. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||
b. 466
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
No in FE must be an error. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , No pedal release mark |
||||||
b. 466-469
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we present slightly longer hairpins of FE (cf. the mark in bars 450-453). No in EE must result from omission. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
||||||
b. 466-477
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we present both consistent and natural slurring of FE (and GE). In EE the slurs over chorale phrases in these bars are shorter, analogous to previous examples (in b. 226). In GC the slur in bars 474-476 (b. 476 is the last one on the page) is ambiguous as its ending suggest conitnuation but it doesnt extend over in b. 477, moreover its beginning is notated as boldly as its ending, hence its cautious interpretation. We then assume - contrary to GE - that the slur extends over 3 bars only. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE inaccuracies , Inaccuracies in GC |
||||||
b. 466
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we omit before d1. category imprint: Editorial revisions |