|
b. 340-341
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The missing slur over the top voice must be a mistake of GE1 (→FE→EE). However, it may not be a common oversight, but an atypical example of a transfer of sign: a slur was printed under the notes instead of over them, although of the same range, which gave it a form of a tie of f1 (the engraver could have been encouraged to perform such a change by, e.g. lack of space under the notes). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||
|
b. 340-342
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
GE overlooked the dashes marking the range of cresc. It is most probably an oversight of the engraver. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
|||||||
|
b. 340
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
GE2 (→GE3) removed the rests of the solo piano part. The reason was probably the fact that they had been placed in GE1 clearly after the quaver ending the Tutti – particularly the R.H. may give an impression that the bar contains 5 quavers. The notation of FE does not pose such a threat, and the one of EE even less. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||
|
b. 340-341
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||
|
b. 340-348
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The crossings-out and additions visible in A in b. 340 & 348 allow us to reconstruct the original version of the passage in these bars: category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A , Deletions in A , Main-line changes |
.