|
b. 341-342
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
The A slur is most probably inaccurate, both its beginning and ending. This is supported by the comparison with the precise slurs in analogous bar 342 and 345-346 (cf. also bars 162-164, 166-168 and 170-172, which show traces of slur corrections in A). In GE (→EE,IE) it was most probably reproduced in this form, although in the available copies of GE the slur seems to be starting from the 2nd quaver, which is probably a printing defect (the position of the bar, in the right-hand bottom corner of the page, is conducive to such inaccuracies). The later starting point of the slur in FE probably resulted from this defect. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Inaccurate slurs in A |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 341
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
The wedge was added in GE (→FE,EE,IE), probably by analogy with bar 345. We do not include it in the main text, as the majority of the analogous bars do not contain staccato marks. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 341-346
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
In the sources the marks in bar 341, 345 and 346 are provided with the form of short accents. However, the comparison with analogous bars reveals that in each of the two sections based on similar motifs (bars 162-171 and 293-312) Chopin most probably meant the same type of accent, which is long accent. In the first fragment there are 5 accents, 3 of which are clearly long, one is short, while one is ambiguous. In the other section out of 4 accents 2 are long, one is short, and one is ambiguous. Due to the above, in the main text we suggest long accents also in the discussed bars. category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Long accents |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 342-344
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
We suggest adding staccato signs in a similar context in bars 342 and 344 after the dots in the L.H. in bar 348 written in A. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 342-348
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The musical sense requires that the accents featured in bars 342, 344 and 346-348 concern both hands, which was, however, marked with separate accents in FE only in bars 342 and 347. In GE1 (→GE2), this notation was repeated, except for bar 344, in which the accent (long) was placed between the staves, thus, it applies to both hands. In EE and GE3, accents for the L.H. were added in all the places where they were absent. In the main text, we order and unify the inconsistent and most probably inaccurate notation of FE, placing one accent between the parts of both hands in each of the five places (cf. the notation of category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
marks).